<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bought and Paid For</title>
	<link>http://talkdelaware.com/blogs/mopaliski/2007/09/24/bought-and-paid-for/</link>
	<description>Focused on Delaware's Legislative Politics, touching on everything else ...</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 05:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: M. Opaliski</title>
		<link>http://talkdelaware.com/blogs/mopaliski/2007/09/24/bought-and-paid-for/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>M. Opaliski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 11:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://talkdelaware.com/blogs/mopaliski/2007/09/24/bought-and-paid-for/#comment-4</guid>
		<description>No, that wasn't the point of this at all. The amendment was symbolic, it was in response to the fact that a lot of people were pissed off about the ad, not politicians, just people, who expressed their concern. The politicians, being what they are thought they should do "something" so they did. They passed a non-binding amendment. but, in doing so the four Democrats in the Senate who are running for POTUS voted against it or didn’t vote at all. What I was doing with this post was taking a well deserved and well placed but totally partisan shot at four people who thought about the financial aspect of MoveOn in their run for the presidency and figured that it outweighed a vote on a meaningless piece of legislation ... hence, they're bought and paid for ... by MoveOn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, that wasn&#8217;t the point of this at all. The amendment was symbolic, it was in response to the fact that a lot of people were pissed off about the ad, not politicians, just people, who expressed their concern. The politicians, being what they are thought they should do &#8220;something&#8221; so they did. They passed a non-binding amendment. but, in doing so the four Democrats in the Senate who are running for POTUS voted against it or didn’t vote at all. What I was doing with this post was taking a well deserved and well placed but totally partisan shot at four people who thought about the financial aspect of MoveOn in their run for the presidency and figured that it outweighed a vote on a meaningless piece of legislation &#8230; hence, they&#8217;re bought and paid for &#8230; by MoveOn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://talkdelaware.com/blogs/mopaliski/2007/09/24/bought-and-paid-for/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 11:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://talkdelaware.com/blogs/mopaliski/2007/09/24/bought-and-paid-for/#comment-3</guid>
		<description>SOooo, you can get in trouble with the government for bad mouthing a person in the press?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SOooo, you can get in trouble with the government for bad mouthing a person in the press?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
